compass-investigate-dynamicallylisted

# compass-investigate-dynamically Run an explicit **Reasoning / Action / Observation** loop. Each step's action is chosen from what the previous observation revealed — not from a plan made upfront. ## The loop For each step, write three labeled parts: - **Reasoning** — name the specific remaining unknown you are trying to close. - **Action** — the single tool call that closes *that named gap*. **Choose a tool only when your Reasoning names a gap it resolves.** Never call a tool "to be thorough" or "in case it's useful" — if Reasoning didn't name the gap, don't take the action. - **Observation** — what the result actually showed (quote it; don't paraphrase into a conclusion). Repeat until the question is answered. The stopping condition is "no remaining unknown blocks the answer", not a fixed step count. ## Discipline - **Look up factual claims rather than guess.** When a step needs a fact, get it with a tool. **Never fill a gap with plausible prior knowledge** — that defeats the point of investigating. - If you catch yourself about to act without a named gap, stop and write the Reasoning first. If you can't name the gap, you don't need the action. ## Output - the full step-by-step loop in Reasoning / Action / Observation format - a **Final output** section whose every claim traces to a specific Observation ## Related When a claim needs stronger sourcing, hand it to `compass-ground-evidence`. When you need to check exactly one named assumption in a bound