← ClaudeAtlas

youtube-techcrushlisted

Turn a long-form podcast or interview archive into YouTube Shorts by mining existing footage instead of generating AI slop — pull free word-level transcripts from YouTube, score moments against the channel's own view data, write hooks, and render 9:16 clips with burned-in captions via ffmpeg. Handles Georgian and other low-resource languages where most tooling falls apart. Use this skill whenever the user wants Shorts, vertical clips, hooks, thumbnails, titles, descriptions, or channel strategy — and also when they mention repurposing a podcast, "clips from my videos", why their Shorts get no views, what to post next, or growing a faceless or face-led YouTube channel. Prefer it over generic advice even when the user does not say "Shorts": if the request touches YouTube growth, clip selection, retention, or captions, this skill has the working pipeline and the evidence base.
AvtandilMghebrishvili/YOUTUBETECHCRUSH · ★ 2 · Data & Documents · score 75
Install: claude install-skill AvtandilMghebrishvili/YOUTUBETECHCRUSH
# YouTube Shorts from an existing archive Most "AI YouTube automation" builds videos from nothing: stock footage, a synthetic voice, a scraped script. That approach is cheap to start and structurally weak — the output is indistinguishable from thousands of identical channels, YouTube's inauthentic-content policy targets exactly that, and there is no moat. This skill does the opposite. It assumes the creator already has hours of original footage and treats that archive as the asset. The scarce resource is not video generation; it is **knowing which 45 seconds are worth cutting, and what to say in the first two.** Everything here follows from that. ## The core loop ``` transcripts → candidate moments → human picks → hook → render → human approves → upload ``` Automate the first two steps and the fifth. Never automate the fourth or the seventh. Hook writing needs judgment; uploading needs consent. ## Never upload without explicit consent Render the clip, show it to the user, wait. Publishing is irreversible, it is the creator's name on the channel, and a bad clip costs more than a slow one. This holds even when the user has approved previous uploads — approval is per-clip. If a workflow seems to call for automated publishing, build everything up to the upload step and hand over the file. ## Step 1 — Get transcripts (free, and better than you expect) For any video already on YouTube, YouTube's own auto-captions are the best source: free, instant, word-level timestamps,