skeptic-review

Solid

Use when you want an adversarial steelman pass on a text artifact before it ships — surface the load-bearing claims, the strongest unaddressed counter-position, the top failure modes, and any causality-vs-correlation gaps. Encodes the Skeptic deliberator role from the agent-council 5-perspective quality gate. Use standalone for fast structural critique, or compose with the other 4 deliberator skills (voice-identity-review, evidence-calibration-review, strategy-stakes-review, adjudicator-synthesis) to run a Council-style review without spinning up the full Python CLI.

AI & Automation 9 stars 1 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 83/100

Stars 20%
33
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Purpose Run an adversarial steelman pass on a text artifact before it ships. The Skeptic role takes the perspective of the smartest hostile reader the artifact will ever meet — the rival PM with a competing system, the reviewer two promotion levels above the author, the buyer who has already heard six worse pitches today — and surfaces the load-bearing weakness that would let that reader reject the artifact on substance. The Skeptic is not a stylistic editor or a generic critic. It is a **structural skeptic**: it looks for the place where the argument's spine breaks under weight. Which claim, if proven false, would collapse the rest? Which counter-position would a sharp opponent raise that the artifact never addresses? Where does the author confuse correlation with causation, or sample with population? This Skill encodes the Skeptic role from the `agent-council` 5-deliberator quality gate. Use it standalone for a fast structural critique, or compose with the other 4 deliberator skills to run a Council-style review of a Tier-1 artifact. ## When to Use / When NOT to Use **Use this skill when:** - You have a draft of a Tier-1 artifact (external-facing, identity-shaping, or irreversible) and want a structural critique before it ships - A spec or memo will face a hostile reader (skeptical VP, rival PM, board member) and you want the load-bearing weakness surfaced before they find it - You suspect the argument has a counter-position the author has not defanged and you want ...

Details

Author
Avyayalaya
Repository
Avyayalaya/agent-council
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

strategy-stakes-review

Use when you want a strategic-fit and opportunity-cost check on a text artifact before it ships — assess goal alignment against the operator's life-goals or portfolio framework, name the specific opportunity cost (what queued work this preempts), run the kill-criteria check, and assess identity coherence with the operator's executive arc. Encodes the Strategy & Stakes deliberator role from the agent-council 5-perspective quality gate. Use standalone for fast strategic check, or compose with the other 4 deliberator skills.

9 Updated 1 weeks ago
Avyayalaya
AI & Automation Solid

critic

Tool-grounded Critic skill (layered eval architecture, Layer 2). Dispatched as a subagent on high-stakes outputs. Grounds the verdict against tool-fetched evidence, not self-reflection. Returns SHIP / SHIP_WITH_FIXES / BLOCK with fixes + reason + confidence. Pairs with the stake classifier (Layer 1) and branching-workflow (Layer 3). Used by content drafts, regulatory-style takes, partner outreach drafts, and proposals.

3 Updated today
0xUrsanomics
AI & Automation Solid

adjudicator-synthesis

Use when you have run 2 or more agent-council deliberator skills on the same artifact (Skeptic, Voice & Identity, Evidence & Calibration, Strategy & Stakes) and want their structured critiques synthesized into a single SHIP / REVISE / HOLD verdict with a concrete revision brief. Encodes the Adjudicator role from the agent-council 5-perspective quality gate. The Adjudicator does not produce a new critique — it produces the decision document the operator acts on.

9 Updated 1 weeks ago
Avyayalaya