course-rebuildlisted

# Course rebuild Answer the audit's findings. Propose options, let the lecturer choose, then build the chosen thing. This skill does **not** work through a checklist. It works through a list of problems somebody has already accepted. ## Start from accepted findings `course-audit` ends by numbering its findings and asking the lecturer to mark each **accept / reject / change**. Work only on the accepted ones. If you were not handed that list, ask for it before proposing anything. If there was no audit, say so and ask for three things instead — you cannot infer any of them: - the topic students get wrong every year, however it is taught - what happens in class that is not written in the file - what a graduate should still be able to do in five years **Never work on a finding the lecturer rejected**, and never re-propose it later in a different shape. If a rejection looks like a mistake, say so once, briefly, and move on. ## Two rules through everything below **Assume every student has an AI assistant.** Not "might have". Never rely on a rule telling them not to use one, and build tasks that make them better at using it rather than tasks that pretend it is absent. **Plain words for the wrapping, the subject's own words for the subject.** Briefs, instructions and notes read simply. Technical terms stay exactly as the course uses them — students must leave able to use them, and the examiner expects them. --- ## Step 1 — Propose, do not decide For each accepted finding,