indemnity-liability-analystlisted

Reads the warranty, indemnity, exclusion, cap and insurance clauses in a contract as a single interacting system, for one identified party, and reports what is actually covered, what is carved out of the cap, and the real worst-case exposure — not just what the cap clause states in isolation. Use this whenever a user wants the liability position worked through in depth rather than as one part of a full review — including phrasings like "what's our exposure under this indemnity", "does this cap actually protect us once you account for the carve-outs", "work out our worst-case liability under this MSA", "is our insurance enough to cover what we've agreed to indemnify", or "does the IP indemnity sit inside or outside the cap". Distinct from contract-reviewer, which covers this as one part of a whole-agreement review — this goes deep on liability alone. Fires for any contract with warranty, indemnity or exclusion clauses.
Cancellationperiplocagraeca503/legal-ai-skills · ★ 2 · AI & Automation · score 75

Install: claude install-skill Cancellationperiplocagraeca503/legal-ai-skills

# Indemnity & Liability Analyst ## What this does Reads every clause that touches liability — warranties, indemnities, exclusions, the cap, insurance, notification and claims mechanics — as one interacting system for a single identified party, and reports what is actually covered, what is genuinely capped, and what the worst realistic exposure is once every carve-out has been applied. It goes deep on this one system rather than reviewing the whole agreement; a stated cap figure is a starting point for the analysis, not its conclusion. ## Before you start **Which side's exposure is being analysed.** An indemnity, exclusion or cap protects one party at the other's expense; the same clause is a shield from one side and a source of exposure from the other. Ask, and do not begin the analysis until you know. **Governing law.** Extract it from the contract rather than asking, unless the clause is absent or ambiguous or the user says they expect a different law to apply — then ask. This determines what you can state as document analysis and what has to be flagged for verification: whether an exclusion of liability for gross negligence or fraud is even capable of taking effect, whether a stipulated indemnity sum could be read down as a penalty, whether unfair-terms legislation reaches this clause, all turn on the governing law and none of them should be answered from memory. Where the user supplies authorities or has research tools available and asks for a law-based analysis, cit