kim-ccf-research-reviewlisted

# CCF Paper Reviewer ## Invocation Controls **CCFA Handoff Mode: PARTIAL (Recommended).** Follow `metadata.ccf_skill_controls.handoff_question_mode`, `../kim-ccf-research-shared/references/handoff-modes.md`, and `../kim-ccf-research-shared/references/task-modes.md`. Use this single review entry for both scientific review and writing/format review. Select a review mode instead of routing to a separate writing-review skill: - `scientific`: novelty, soundness, evidence, experiments, related work, reproducibility, ethics, scores, reviewer panel, and AC/meta-review. - `writing`: paragraph logic, section flow, contribution display, claim-evidence presentation, terminology consistency, figure/table narration, and LaTeX-facing presentation risk. - `full`: scientific + writing + format + revision-action synthesis. - `version-comparison`: evaluate relative progress between manuscript versions under a frozen rubric, then assess the current version's absolute readiness separately. Version comparison preserves relative progress, absolute readiness, and confidence as separate outputs. Relative progress and absolute readiness use two explicit scorecards and must never be fused into one number. Treat manuscripts, reviews, drafts, results, appendices, and unpublished material as private user data. Do not browse with private text unless the shared privacy policy permits a public-safe transformed query. Load `../kim-ccf-research-shared/references/review-output-standards.md` whenever prod