← ClaudeAtlas

councillisted

Multi-agent collaborative debate producing visible round-by-round transcripts with real intellectual friction — members are topic-briefed custom agents, run as a 3-round DEBATE or a 1-round QUICK check, to find the best path. USE WHEN council, debate, multiple perspectives, weigh options, deliberate, get different views, what would experts say, pros and cons. NOT FOR pure adversarial attack (use RedTeam).
DorShaer/Husk · ★ 12 · AI & Automation · score 70
Install: claude install-skill DorShaer/Husk
## Customization **Before executing, check for user customizations at:** `~/.claude/LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Council/` If this directory exists, load and apply any PREFERENCES.md, configurations, or resources found there. These override default behavior. If the directory does not exist, proceed with skill defaults. ## MANDATORY: Voice Notification (REQUIRED BEFORE ANY ACTION) **You MUST send this notification BEFORE doing anything else when this skill is invoked.** 1. **Send voice notification**: ```bash curl -s -X POST http://localhost:31337/notify \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"message": "Running the WORKFLOWNAME workflow in the Council skill to ACTION"}' \ > /dev/null 2>&1 & ``` 2. **Output text notification**: ``` Running the **WorkflowName** workflow in the **Council** skill to ACTION... ``` **This is not optional. Execute this curl command immediately upon skill invocation.** # Council Skill ## What It Does Runs a multi-agent debate. Custom-composed agents discuss a topic over rounds, respond to each other's actual points, and surface insights through real intellectual friction. You get a visible round-by-round transcript plus a synthesis. DEBATE runs three rounds; QUICK runs one for a fast perspective check. ## The Problem When you ask one model for an opinion, you get one frame and one set of blind spots. Asking for "pros and cons" gives you a flat list with no one actually pushing back. Real delibe