seo-aeo-geo-content-reviewlisted

# SEO / AEO / GEO Blog Content Review Review web content the way a senior content strategist who understands modern search would: verify the facts first, judge how well it serves the searcher's real intent, grade it against the systems that actually rank and cite content (Google's ranking systems, E-E-A-T, the reviews system, and the AI engines), score it honestly, then hand the author a fix plan that says exactly what to do and how far each move can realistically take them. The output is an audit plus an action plan, not a rewrite. Only rewrite if asked. --- ## Core principles (apply in every phase) These are the difference between a useful audit and slop. Hold them throughout. 1. **Verify before you assert. Never invent.** Any factual claim about the present-day world (prices, "current" anything, statistics, who holds a role, whether a tool/feature exists) must be checked with web search against a primary source before you grade the content's accuracy or repeat the claim. If you cannot verify something, say "unverifiable from the text alone" rather than guessing. Never fabricate a statistic, a quote, an attribution, or a source. This phase is what separates this skill from a vibe check. 2. **Tag the provenance of every claim you make.** Distinguish four tiers, and never let a lower tier masquerade as a higher one: - **Google-confirmed** (from Google's own docs/guidance) - **Study or measured data** (a named study, dataset, or tool report)