← ClaudeAtlas

pr-descriptionlisted

Generate a clear, reviewer-friendly pull-request description from a diff, covering what changed, why, risk, and how it was tested. Use when opening a pull request or writing/improving a PR body.
KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 73
Install: claude install-skill KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude
Write a pull-request description from the actual changes on this branch. Base it on the diff, not on what you assume was intended. ## Gather context - Diff the branch against its base (default to the repo's main branch, or the base the user named): review the changed files, the commits, and their messages. - Identify the linked issue/ticket if one is referenced in the branch name, commits, or arguments. - Separate the substantive change from incidental churn (formatting, renames, generated files). ## Write the description Use this structure, omitting any section that genuinely doesn't apply: - **Summary**: one or two sentences on what this PR does. - **What changed**: the concrete changes, grouped logically, referencing key files. - **Why**: the motivation or problem being solved; link the issue. - **Risk / impact**: blast radius, backward compatibility, breaking changes, data migrations, config/env or infra changes, anything reviewers should scrutinise. - **Testing**: how it was verified, including tests added/updated, manual steps, and explicitly what was *not* covered. - **Notes for reviewers**: trade-offs, follow-ups, screenshots for UI changes. ## Rules - Be factual and specific; describe what the diff does, and don't speculate or oversell. - Call out breaking changes and required migration steps prominently. - Keep it scannable: short paragraphs and bullets over walls of text. - If the repo has a PR template (`.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE*`), match its structure