← ClaudeAtlas

mapping-discovery-assumptionslisted

Use when an idea or solution rests on untested beliefs, when deciding what to research or test next, when prioritizing risks by importance and evidence, or when running an assumptions, desirability/feasibility/viability, or riskiest-assumption-test workshop. For product managers, UX designers, and requirements engineers de-risking before building.
Luis85/specorator · ★ 0 · Web & Frontend · score 68
Install: claude install-skill Luis85/specorator
# Mapping Discovery Assumptions ## Overview Every idea is a stack of beliefs. This skill makes them **explicit, falsifiable, and prioritized**, so experimentation targets what actually matters — and so the team learns *before* it builds, not after. ## When to use - You have a candidate solution, value proposition, or initiative with many unknowns. - The team disagrees about what is "true," or is about to build on an untested premise. - You need to decide what to research or test next. ## Workflow 1. **Surface assumptions.** Write each belief as a falsifiable statement: **"We believe that…"** One belief per note. Phrasing it this way forces the mindset that you might be wrong. 2. **Categorize by risk** (color-code) — cover **all four** of Cagan's big product risks, not just feasibility: - **Desirability** — do customers want it? (owner: design/UX) - **Usability** — can users figure out how to use it? (owner: design/UX) - **Feasibility** — can we build/scale it? (owner: engineering) - **Viability** — does it work for the business? (owner: PM) - *(optional)* **Adaptability** — can it survive a changing environment? · **Ethical** — should we build it at all? (Strategyzer's classic set is desirability/feasibility/viability and folds usability under desirability; track usability **explicitly** so the map is a complete risk inventory consistent with `running-product-discovery`'s four risks.) 3. **Plot on the 2×2.** Axes: **Importance** (Y: if this is wrong, d