peer-reviewlisted

Get a cross-model PEER REVIEW of a concrete change/diff from Codex (a different model), read-only. Use before merging a non-trivial change when an outside, blind-spot-catching review adds value. Costs the user's Codex credits.
Mace-Enterprise/Agent-Knowledge-Memory-Wiki · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 60

Install: claude install-skill Mace-Enterprise/Agent-Knowledge-Memory-Wiki

# Peer review (cross-model, via Codex) A different model reviews a concrete diff as a peer reviewer — catches what a same-model review misses. Codex **enacts our `role-code-reviewer` brief**, so the output matches our own review format. Read-only; Codex advises, we decide. ## When Before merging a non-trivial change/PR, or for an independent check on risky code. Not on every commit (costs credits, fresh session). Confirm first unless the user said "peer-review it". ## How ```bash codex exec -C <repo> -s read-only "PEER REVIEW. Enact the reviewer brief in Wiki/roster/role-code-reviewer.md. Review this change: <git diff base..head, or name the files/SHAs>. Return: Strengths · Issues (Critical/Important/Minor, each with file:line + why) · Verdict (ship / fix-first / reject). Be concrete. Read-only — change nothing." ``` Give it the diff or the base/head SHAs + changed files; `-C <repo>` lets it read the surrounding code. ## After Relay the review, then add your take: which issues are real, which miss our context. Fix Critical before merge. **Codex advises; we decide.** ## Notes - Read-only only — never a write sandbox for review. - Fresh session → pass context in the prompt; **never feed it secrets**. - Setup + gotchas (upgrade CLI if model errors): see [[codex-cross-model-integration]]. **Status:** probation — promote to active after a verified win.