okhp3-equilibrium-reviewlisted

# okhp3-equilibrium-review **OverKill Hill P³** · [overkillhill.com](https://overkillhill.com) · [github.com/OKHP3](https://github.com/OKHP3) The Equilibrium Review skill turns agreement and disagreement into a traceable decision. It evaluates an artifact without assuming that a polished answer, majority vote, or self-review is proof of correctness. --- ## Purpose Use this skill as a quality gate around an artifact-producing workflow. The artifact may be a paper, research memo, spreadsheet, dashboard, Outlook assessment, hypothesis, decision recommendation, or Agent Skill. The skill's default job is to review and improve the decision record, not silently rewrite the artifact or take consequential action. The equilibrium metaphor is operational, not a claim that language-model reviewers compute a formal Nash equilibrium. A useful review has provisional harmony when independent reviewers converge for evidence-backed reasons. It has productive disharmony when they identify a material difference. A disruptor is introduced to search for falsifiable counterexamples when harmony may be false. A negotiator resolves disagreement from evidence, not from vote counting. ## Scope | In scope | Out of scope | |---|---| | Claim, evidence, utility, safety, portability, and reader-usefulness review | Inventing evidence or declaring perfection | | Conditional five-role multi-agent review | Unbounded agent debate or ceremonial dissent | | Hypothesis and measurement-design audit | Perform