eu-ai-act-triagelisted

Classify an AI system under the EU AI Act — prohibited, high-risk, transparency-only, or minimal — establish whether the organisation is provider or deployer, and produce the resulting obligation set with dates. Use this whenever the EU AI Act, AI Act, Regulation 2024/1689, Annex III, high-risk AI, GPAI, or AI conformity assessment comes up; whenever someone asks "is this high-risk?", "does the AI Act apply to us?", "what do we have to do for this AI system?", or "are we a provider or a deployer?"; and whenever an AI system touches employment, recruitment, credit or creditworthiness, insurance pricing, education, essential public or private services, biometrics, emotion recognition, critical infrastructure, law enforcement, migration, or the administration of justice, since those are the Annex III areas where high-risk classification is most often missed. Also use it when an organisation is fine-tuning, rebranding, or materially modifying a third-party AI system, because that can silently convert a deployer i
PKusch/remit · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 72

Install: claude install-skill PKusch/remit

# EU AI Act triage Produces a defensible classification and the obligations that follow. It does not produce legal advice, and the output should say so — see **Limits** at the end, which is not boilerplate you can drop. Work from a system record where one exists (see [`ai-system-intake`](../ai-system-intake/SKILL.md)). If none exists, gather the same facts first; classification without the facts is guesswork with a citation attached. ## The order matters Run these in sequence. Each step can terminate the analysis, and running them out of order produces confident wrong answers. ### 1. Territorial scope (Art. 2) Does the Act reach this system at all? It applies to providers placing systems on the EU market or putting them into service in the EU **regardless of where the provider is established**, to deployers established or located in the EU, and to providers and deployers in third countries where the **output is used in the EU**. That last limb catches organisations that assume they are out of scope because they are not in Europe. Ask where the output lands, not where the company is. Note the carve-outs: national security and military purposes, purely personal non-professional use, and systems released under free and open-source licences except where they are prohibited, high-risk, or subject to Art. 50 transparency duties. ### 2. Is it an AI system at all (Art. 3(1)) Machine-based, designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy, may exhibit adaptiveness, and in