← ClaudeAtlas

psselisted

Progressive-disclosure workflow for PSSE studies through PowerMCP. Use when the user asks to open a PSSE case, solve the base case, discover the right PSSPY command, or execute targeted PSSE automation, and when generic API execution should come only after command lookup and base-case validation.
Power-Agent/PowerSkills · ★ 21 · AI & Automation · score 67
Install: claude install-skill Power-Agent/PowerSkills
# PSSE workflow Treat PSSE as a layered interface. Start with the built-in base-case tools. Use generic `psspy` execution only after the correct command and argument shape are known. ## Default tool ladder 1. `open_case(case)` 2. `solve_case()` 3. `search_psspy_commands(query, category)` or `lookup_psspy_command(function_name)` to discover the right API entry point. 4. `run_psspy_command(function_name, arguments)` only after the command contract is explicit. ## Working rules - Do not use `run_psspy_command` as a search tool. Search or look up first. - Keep every executed command tied to a study objective, not just API curiosity. - Re-solve or re-check the case after commands that alter topology, controls, or dispatch. - Use `dynamic-stability-mitigation` for dynamic issues and the steady-state mitigation skills for voltage, thermal, or contingency findings. ## Deliver - The case, the command path chosen, and why it was needed. - The arguments passed to the command. - The study outcome and any required mitigation.