crypto-idea-evaluatorlisted

# Crypto Idea Evaluator Convert an informal idea into falsifiable research claims and a decision-ready brief. Do not assume significance, novelty, correctness, security, or performance. ## Scope In scope: problem/claim formalization, baseline and threat-model selection, assumption/parameter inventory, proof and experiment obligations, feasibility/significance risks, ethics, and kill criteria. Out of scope: declaring novelty without search, proving theorems, inventing results, writing a finished paper, or submitting/publishing anything. ## Required Inputs - the proposed construction, technique, observation, or target improvement; - intended primitive/protocol, security notion/model, adversary, and use case; - expected difference from known baselines; - available theory, implementation, data, compute, and time constraints. Ask for missing information only when it changes the core research question. Otherwise state assumptions. ## Success Criteria - The idea becomes explicit research questions and falsifiable claims. - Functionality, security, efficiency, usability, and novelty claims are separated. - Each claim has required proof, literature, parameter, or experimental evidence. - Baselines, closest-work search needs, assumptions, threat model, parameters, and ethical risks are visible. - Feasibility risks and kill/pivot criteria are concrete. - The recommendation is proceed, proceed with prerequisites, pivot, or stop—never “promising” without evidence. ## Failure Mod