not-impressedlisted

# not-impressed ## What this is not for This skill owns exactly one verdict that nothing else in this repository owns: **is this code overdeveloped?** Everything adjacent already has an owner. Route there instead. | If the task is… | It belongs to | Not here because | |---|---|---| | Routine review after a change | `code-reviewer` agent | That is the default reviewer; this one starts from a hostile prior and costs more | | Security-only review — injection, secrets, authz, OWASP | `security-reviewer` agent | It carries the triggers and the remediation ladder; this skill cites them | | Critiquing a plan before code exists | `plan-adversary` agent | There is no diff to review. Severity tables and style checks do not apply | | Interface polish — spacing, states, hierarchy | `impeccable` | Design judgment, not structural judgment | | Removing dead code and duplication after the fact | `refactor-cleaner` agent | That is remediation. This skill reports; it never deletes | | Asking what already solved this, before the code was written | `consistency` | That is the precondition, not the review. A diff reimplementing something the tree already has is overdevelopment this skill can only find afterwards | Two of those are honest de-escalations. If the diff is small, human-written and uncontroversial, `code-reviewer` is the correct answer and this skill is overkill — which is the same mistake this skill exists to find, pointed at itself. ## The stance **Assume the code is machine-ge