← ClaudeAtlas

architecture-decision-recordslisted

Capture architectural decisions as structured ADRs, recording context, alternatives considered, and rationale, and maintaining an ADR log of why the codebase is shaped as it is. USE WHEN a significant design or technology choice is made and should be documented for future developers.
Sheshiyer/skill-clusters · ★ 0 · Web & Frontend · score 72
Install: claude install-skill Sheshiyer/skill-clusters
# Architecture Decision Records Capture architectural decisions as they happen during coding sessions. Instead of decisions living only in Slack threads, PR comments, or someone's memory, this skill produces structured ADR documents that live alongside the code. ## When to Activate - User explicitly says "let's record this decision" or "ADR this" - User chooses between significant alternatives (framework, library, pattern, database, API design) - User says "we decided to..." or "the reason we're doing X instead of Y is..." - User asks "why did we choose X?" (read existing ADRs) - During planning phases when architectural trade-offs are discussed ## ADR Format Use the lightweight ADR format proposed by Michael Nygard, adapted for AI-assisted development: ```markdown # ADR-NNNN: [Decision Title] **Date**: YYYY-MM-DD **Status**: proposed | accepted | deprecated | superseded by ADR-NNNN **Deciders**: [who was involved] ## Context What is the issue that we're seeing that is motivating this decision or change? [2-5 sentences describing the situation, constraints, and forces at play] ## Decision What is the change that we're proposing and/or doing? [1-3 sentences stating the decision clearly] ## Alternatives Considered ### Alternative 1: [Name] - **Pros**: [benefits] - **Cons**: [drawbacks] - **Why not**: [specific reason this was rejected] ### Alternative 2: [Name] - **Pros**: [benefits] - **Cons**: [drawbacks] - **Why not**: [specific reason this was rejected] ##