design-reviewlisted

# Design Review Review a web app or page for visual design quality. This is not a UX audit (usability, workflow, friction) — this checks whether the design is **professional, consistent, and polished**. The goal: would a design-conscious person look at this and think "this is well made" or "this looks like a developer designed it"? ## When to Use - Before showing something to a client or team - When something "looks off" but you can't pinpoint why - After building a feature, before calling it done - Periodic quality check on a shipped product - After a UX audit — this is the visual companion ## Browser Tool Detection Same as ux-audit — Chrome MCP, Playwright MCP, or playwright-cli. ## URL Resolution Same as ux-audit — prefer deployed/live over localhost. ## What to Check ### 1. Layout and Spacing | Check | Good | Bad | |-------|------|-----| | **Consistent spacing** | Same gap between all cards in a grid, same padding in all sections | Some cards have 16px gap, others 24px. Header padding differs from body | | **Alignment** | Left edges of content align vertically across sections | Heading starts at one indent, body text at another, cards at a third | | **Breathing room** | Generous whitespace around content, elements don't feel cramped | Text touching container edges, buttons crowded against inputs | | **Grid discipline** | Content follows a clear column grid | Elements placed freely, no underlying structure | | **Responsive proportions** | Sidebar/content ratio l