← ClaudeAtlas

pr-reviewlisted

Review SOMEONE ELSE'S pull request in depth, from a PR URL (or number) plus an optional Jira issue key. Fetches the whole repository locally as a detached git worktree (never touching your own branches or checkout), reads every changed file in full with no sampling, and establishes why the code is the way it is (git log, git blame, the PR body, the linked issue, prior PRs on the same files) before calling anything a defect: whatever it cannot ground is asked as a question to the author instead. Fans thirteen review passes out to parallel subagents, then merges them into one ranked Korean report with file:line evidence, split into 결함 / 판단 사항 / 범위 밖 / 질문. It reports to you and posts NOTHING: no review, no comment, no code edit. To judge review comments left on your own PR, use review-triage instead; to check your own unpushed work, use self-review. Triggers on phrases like '이 PR 리뷰해줘', 'PR 코드 리뷰 부탁해', '남의 PR 검토해줘', '이 풀리퀘 꼼꼼히 봐줘', 'review this PR', 'review someone else's pull request', 'deep review of PR 1629'.
Srltas/claude-skills · ★ 0 · Code & Development · score 67
Install: claude install-skill Srltas/claude-skills
# Review someone else's pull request Input: a PR URL or number, optionally a Jira key. Output: one ranked Korean report handed to the user, who decides whether any line of it is worth posting. **This skill posts nothing and edits nothing.** ## The stance Reviewing someone else's code fails in the opposite direction from reviewing your own. On your own work you go easy. On someone else's you assert a defect you have misread, because you do not know why the code is the way it is. - **Ground it before you call it.** A defect needs `git log` and `git blame` on the touched lines, the PR body, the linked issue, or a prior PR on the same file. No grounding, no defect. - **Ungrounded observations go out as 질문**, addressed to the author, never as assertions. - **It has to survive review-triage.** This report is the exact input to the sibling `review-triage` skill, which rules each comment 타당 / 부분 / 부당 / 범위 밖 / 취향 / 확인필요. A finding ruled 부당 is worse than no finding: it costs the author time and costs you the credibility that carries the next twenty findings. - **Apply 범위 밖 to yourself.** A correct observation about something this PR never set out to do is a follow-up suggestion, marked as one, never mixed into the defect list. - **Tone: a colleague, not an auditor.** Acknowledge that something is legal or intentional before pointing at it, say what the fix costs, and grant the exception yourself when the author plausibly had a reason. ## Step 1: Put the PR on this machine ```bash