← ClaudeAtlas

deep-researchlisted

Deep, multi-source research for acting under uncertainty — answers WHAT to aim for, WHY it matters, and HOW to pursue it, when the answer requires surveying a live field rather than retrieving one fact. Output-agnostic by design: the starting intent ('what should I write about?') is treated as provisional, because research routinely reveals the real move is something else — a thing to build, a decision to make, a plan to change, a habit to adopt, a feature to ship. It maps the operator's existing corpus first (no repeats), sweeps multiple sources and angles, triangulates, and returns ranked proposals each carrying its what/why/how and its recommended output mode. Use for: 'what should we write / build / do / cover next', 'research X and tell me what it means for us', domain-landscape or competitive/positioning analysis, white-space discovery, trend-to-thesis matching, evaluating where a field is heading, or any decision that deserves more than one search. NOT for single fact lookups (plain web search) and NOT
The-AIOS/aios · ★ 40 · AI & Automation · score 79
Install: claude install-skill The-AIOS/aios
# Deep Research Research for **acting under uncertainty**. The caller arrives with a provisional intent — *"what should I write about?"*, *"is X worth building?"*, *"what's happening in this space?"* — and this skill returns **what to aim for, why, and how**, grounded in a real survey of the field and the operator's own corpus. ## The prime directive: intent is provisional There is a chicken-and-egg at the heart of research: **you need the research to know what you're actually looking for.** A run that starts as "find my next post topic" may surface a product gap worth building, a decision that's become urgent, or a risk that reframes the week — and a run that starts as "should we build X?" may reveal the right move is to *write* about X instead. So this skill treats the caller's intent as a **starting lens, not a cage**: - **Honor the lens** — the caller's intent shapes where you look first and how you rank. - **Report what escapes it** — when findings point at a different output mode than the caller asked for, say so explicitly. Never silently discard a discovery because it doesn't fit the original question. - **Re-examine the frame mid-run** — after the sweep, ask: *did the findings change what we should be aiming for?* If yes, name the reframe before ranking. ## Output modes Every proposal names its recommended **output mode** — the form the finding wants to become: | Mode | The finding is… | Typical hand-off | |---|---|---| | **Write** | a thesis/angle worth publ