multi-perspective-review
SolidMulti-perspective collaborative review of plans or documents. Ten expert viewpoints deliberate in 3 rounds to reach consensus.
Install
Quality Score: 80/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- This-HW
- Repository
- This-HW/claude-code-kit
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 3 days ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
multi-persona-review
A panel-review skill that critiques ONE artifact (launch post, README, doc, markdown, plan, design) via 3-5 disjoint user-perspective personas running in parallel, then synthesizes deduped, severity-ranked improvement points (P0/P1/P2). Use when the user says "작성글을 사용자 관점의 페르소나를 여러명 만들어서 (손넷 모델정도로) 피드백 받아바", "다면 리뷰 해볼까", "페르소나로 리뷰", "여러 관점으로 피드백", or in English "multi-persona review", "review this from different user perspectives", "get persona feedback on this post/README/doc", "panel review this artifact". Lighter than a full service audit — point it at ONE artifact, not a whole codebase. Do NOT use it for a whole-service or whole-codebase audit, nor for a gap-vs-benchmark loop (both are audit-service-gaps), and do NOT simulate diversity by renaming reviewers that inspect the same evidence.
plan-review
Critique a written plan (not a diff) via four lenses: CEO premise/ambition, Eng test-coverage, Design states/slop, DevEx time-to-first-value. Proposes findings; the author disposes.
deep-review
Adversarial code review with three parallel perspectives — Advocate, Skeptic, Architect — that create productive tension. Use for high-stakes PRs, architectural changes, or when single-pass review would miss issues. Surfaces findings through disagreement, not consensus.