consult-red-teamlisted

# Consult Red Team -- Multi-Perspective Proposal Review Stress-test the engagement pack before ship. Anti-sycophancy: Devil's Advocate concedes only when severity ≥ 4 (1–5 scale). ## Inputs | Input | Required | |---|---| | Latest frame through commercial + architecture pointer | yes | | `lint-report.md` if exists | recommended | | Framework variant index + chosen merge | recommended | | **`timeln-warned`** on primary technical bet | run before review | ## Prefetch (mandatory) 1. **`timeln-warned`** — topic = primary technical path from arc (e.g. "GPU fine-tuning FSI transcripts") 2. Pass top scars into Devil's Advocate section verbatim ## Four perspectives | Perspective | Question | Output | |---|---|---| | **Client exec** | Can I say yes/no in one read? | Score 0–100 + 3 bullets | | **Procurement** | Are assumptions, out-of-scope, and commercial gaps visible? | Findings table | | **Technical skeptic** | Does architecture + acceptance hold under audit? | Findings table | | **Devil's advocate** | What kills this deal? Use timeln-warned scars. Concede only if severity ≥ 4 | BLOCK / ALLOW + severity | Scoring rubric for exec perspective: reuse `../consult-arc/FRAMEWORK-VARIANTS.md` criteria (decision clarity, measurability, commercial defensibility, technical credibility) — average × 20 for 0–100. ## Verdict - **BLOCK** — DA severity ≥ 4 on any show-stopper, OR exec score < 60 - **ALLOW** — otherwise; warnings ship with pack ## Output -- exactly this shape ``` ## Red