bias-assessor
SolidUse when `evidence-review` has an extraction table and needs lightweight risk-of-bias fields. **Trigger**: bias, risk-of-bias, RoB, evidence quality, 偏倚评估, 证据质量. **Use when**: `evidence-review` 已生成 `papers/extraction_table.csv`，需要在 synthesis 前补齐偏倚/质量字段。 **Skip if**: 不是 evidence/systematic review，或还没有 `papers/extraction_table.csv`。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 使用简单可复核刻度（low/unclear/high）+ 简短 notes；保持字段一致性。
Install
Quality Score: 79/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- WILLOSCAR
- Repository
- WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
- Created
- 7 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- None
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
evidence-auditor
Use when `paper-review` needs a claim-by-claim evidence gap report grounded in an extracted claim ledger. **Trigger**: evidence audit, missing evidence, unsupported claims, 审稿证据审计, 证据缺口. **Use when**: `paper-review` 流程中，需要逐条检查 claim 的证据链、缺 baseline、评测薄弱点。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims 输入（例如还没有 `output/CLAIMS.md`）。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 只写“缺口/风险/下一步验证”，不要替作者补写论述或引入新主张。
biascheck
Three-layer bias analysis on any URL, file, or text — auto-fetches the content and any cited study, then audits data-level biases, source conflicts of interest, and journalism-added distortions, separating what the data supports from what's editorialized. USE WHEN bias analysis, analyze bias, bias check, check this study, who funded this, is this source biased, fact-check article, methodological flaws, source credibility, what's wrong with this claim. NOT FOR psychological author analysis (use _CRITICAL_ANALYSIS), research synthesis (use Research), entity due diligence (use _OSINT).
bio-logic
Evaluate scientific claims, methods, biases, and evidence strength. Use when stress-testing a study design, paper, analysis, or causal interpretation.