citation-diversifierlisted

# Citation Diversifier (budget-as-constraints) [NO NEW FACTS] Purpose: fix a common survey failure mode: - the draft reads under-cited (or reuses the same few citations everywhere) - the pipeline fails the **global unique-citation** gate This skill does **not** change prose by itself. It produces a constraint sheet: `output/CITATION_BUDGET_REPORT.md`. ## Inputs - `output/DRAFT.md` - `outline/outline.yml` (H3 ids/titles; used to allocate budgets per subsection) - `outline/writer_context_packs.jsonl` (source of `allowed_bibkeys_{selected,mapped,chapter,global}` per H3) - `citations/ref.bib` ## Output - `output/CITATION_BUDGET_REPORT.md` ## Non-negotiables (NO NEW FACTS) - Only propose citation keys that exist in `citations/ref.bib`. - Only propose keys that are **in-scope** for the target H3 (prefer subsection-first scope; use chapter/global only when truly cross-cutting). - Do not propose “padding citations” that would require adding new claims or new numbers. ## What a good budget report looks like (contract) The report should feel like a *constraint sheet*, not a random list: - It states the **blocking policy target** and the **gap-to-target** (how many unique keys are missing; policy default is `recommended`). - For each H3, it proposes a scope-safe budget sized to actually close the gap: - small gaps: 3-6 keys / H3 is often enough - `course_paper`: cap suggestions at 3-6 keys / H3 and target the profile's 24/32 global budget - A150++ gaps: plan for ~6-12 ke