← ClaudeAtlas

usability-accessibility-reviewlisted

Usability and accessibility review audits screens, flows, or specs for heuristics, cognitive-walkthrough risks, WCAG/APG/COGA concerns, inclusive design, ethical UX, and dark patterns.
Xopoko/plug-n-skills · ★ 11 · Code & Development · score 77
Install: claude install-skill Xopoko/plug-n-skills
# Usability And Accessibility Review Use for structured, evidence-tied critique, not taste. ## Evidence First Identify: - surface and task; - user or segment; - available evidence; - what was not inspected; - whether the claim needs live behavior, assistive technology, analytics, or user research. Do not claim accessibility compliance from screenshots, mocks, or prose. Static review finds risks; compliance requires testable behavior. With thin evidence, separate observed failures, heuristic risks, standards risks, and validation tasks. ## Review Lenses Use these lenses: - Nielsen: status visibility, real-world language, user control, consistency, error prevention, recognition over recall, flexibility, minimalist relevance, error recovery, help. - Shneiderman: consistency, universal usability, feedback, closure, error prevention/handling, easy reversal, user control, reduced memory load. - Cognitive walkthrough: for primary tasks, can users know the goal, notice the action, understand it, and see progress? - Accessibility floor: WCAG 2.2 as testable baseline; APG/COGA as design guidance. Accessibility checks: - perceivable content and text alternatives; - keyboard operation and focus order; - visible focus; - accessible names and roles; - target size and pointer alternatives; - contrast and non-color indicators; - predictable navigation and help; - reduced redundant entry; - understandable language and recovery; - motion, timeout, and seizure risks; - cognitive supp