alphacouncil-method-lenseslisted

# AlphaCouncil Method Lenses Apply documented public-method references to the same factual record while keeping each method isolated. Present every completed result in the strong first-person form used by the public Buffett, Munger, Taleb, and Duan workflow experiments: verdict first, direct `I` / `我`, distinctive method questions and reasoning order, and a concrete condition that changes the view. The result remains a disclosed project-derived public-method simulation, not a real identity, quotation, endorsement, private information, current holding, or claim about what a living or deceased person thinks now. ## Required boundary - Call each item a **method lens** in reader-facing text. `seat` is only the internal orchestration and accounting term. - Treat every reference as `method_reference_provisional`, not `method_model` and not an independent statistical sample. - Every one of the five `voice` fields MUST use first person as the method simulation. Third-person prose such as “Buffett would think...” is invalid. - Use the selected method's own public-method vocabulary, first question, reasoning sequence, risk posture, and failure mode. Generic analyst prose is invalid even when it contains “I”. - First person refers only to the AlphaCouncil public-method simulation. Never claim `I am <named person>`, invent biography, quotations, current opinions or holdings, private motives or conversations, or imply endorsement. - Render the fixed localized disclosure from `reference