← ClaudeAtlas

aio-code-reviewlisted

Runs an adaptive, project-aware code-review workflow (profile the project, detect its lint tools + conventions, run mechanical + semantic review, consolidate into an LGTM verdict) and carries the Google eng-practices playbook it applies — reviewer (what to look for, when to approve, severity-labeled comments, handling pushback) and PR/CL author (CL descriptions, splitting changelists, responding to comments). Use when reviewing or authoring a PR/MR/CL/diff, running a code review, deciding LGTM or LGTM threshold, authoring a merge request, assessing code health, handling a hotfix review, or replying to review feedback.
aiocean/claude-plugins · ★ 4 · Code & Development · score 74
Install: claude install-skill aiocean/claude-plugins
# Code Review A **CL** (changelist) is one self-contained change under review — equivalent to a PR / MR. **LGTM** = "Looks Good to Me" (reviewer's approval). **Nit:** = optional polish, won't block. This skill does two things: - **Runs a review** — authors and runs an adaptive review *workflow* over a diff/PR (the default when there's code in front of you). See **Run a review** below. - **Coaches a role** — the reviewer / author playbook. It's both the rubric the workflow's agents apply *and* your reference for reviewing by hand. Full principles and rationale: `references/01-overview.md`. ## Pick the lane first | User signal | Lane | Start with | |---|---|---| | "review this PR / check my diff / is this safe to merge" (code is present) | **Run a review** | the workflow below | | "how should I review / what do I look for / should I approve" (no diff, wants guidance) | **Reviewer** playbook | the 8-point checklist below | | "writing a PR description / split my change / respond to review comments" | **Author** playbook | the author sections below | | "is this an emergency / can we skip review" | either | the emergency section + `references/02-emergencies.md` | | Unclear | ask once; default **Run a review** if a diff exists, else **Reviewer** | — | ## Run a review — the workflow When there's actual code to review, don't eyeball it — run the adaptive review workflow. It profiles the project, reviews on two independent tracks, then kills its own false positives before givin