evaluationlisted

# Evaluation Methods for Agent Systems Evaluation of agent systems requires different approaches than traditional software or even standard language model applications. Agents make dynamic decisions, are non-deterministic between runs, and often lack single correct answers. Effective evaluation must account for these characteristics while providing actionable feedback. A robust evaluation framework enables continuous improvement, catches regressions, and validates that context engineering choices achieve intended effects. ## When to Activate Activate this skill when: - Testing agent performance systematically - Validating context engineering choices - Measuring improvements over time - Catching regressions before deployment - Building quality gates for agent pipelines - Comparing different agent configurations - Evaluating production systems continuously ## Core Concepts Agent evaluation requires outcome-focused approaches that account for non-determinism and multiple valid paths. Multi-dimensional rubrics capture various quality aspects: factual accuracy, completeness, citation accuracy, source quality, and tool efficiency. LLM-as-judge provides scalable evaluation while human evaluation catches edge cases. The key insight is that agents may find alternative paths to goals—the evaluation should judge whether they achieve right outcomes while following reasonable processes. **Performance Drivers: The 95% Finding** Research on the BrowseComp evaluation (which tests brow