reasoning-dialecticallisted

# Dialectical Reasoning Synthesize opposing views into higher-order resolution. The logic of productive disagreement. ## Type Signature ``` Dialectical : Thesis → Antithesis → Synthesis Where: Thesis : Position × Evidence × Stakeholder → ArgumentA Antithesis : ArgumentA → CounterPosition × Evidence × Stakeholder → ArgumentB Synthesis : (ArgumentA, ArgumentB) → IntegratedPosition × Tradeoffs ``` ## When to Use **Use dialectical when:** - Stakeholders hold opposing valid positions - Trade-offs need explicit analysis - Strategic tension requires resolution - Multiple perspectives each have merit - "On one hand... on the other" situations **Don't use when:** - Cause-effect chain needed → Use Causal - Explaining observation → Use Abductive - Evaluating past decisions → Use Counterfactual ## Core Principles ### Charitable Interpretation Each position must be represented at its strongest: - Steel-man, don't straw-man - Assume good faith and valid reasoning - Identify the kernel of truth in each view ### Genuine Synthesis Synthesis is NOT: - Compromise (splitting the difference) - Victory (one side wins) - Avoidance (postpone decision) Synthesis IS: - Integration at higher level of abstraction - Resolution that addresses underlying concerns - New position that transcends original framing ## Three-Stage Process ### Stage 1: Thesis **Purpose:** Articulate first position at maximum strength. **Components:** ```yaml thesis: position: statement: "Core cl