← ClaudeAtlas

finance-expense-policy-triagelisted

Triages expense claims against a supplied expense policy using a fixed disposition table, separates a policy breach from a tax or evidence problem, and escalates bribery, conflict-of-interest and fraud indicators out of the finance queue instead of deciding them. Refuses to rule on a claim when the policy text, the receipt evidence or the business purpose was not supplied. Use when reviewing a claim or a batch of claims, when a claimant disputes a rejection, when writing a rejection that must stand up, or when deciding whether a spend pattern needs escalation. Trigger on 'expense claim', 'is this claimable', 'expense policy', 'reject this claim', 'entertainment expense', 'gifts and hospitality', 'per diem', 'out of policy'. Not for explaining a cost-centre budget overrun (use finance-budget-vs-actual-commentary) or for month-end reconciliation (use finance-month-end-variance-analysis).
alihusains/enterprise-skills · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 73
Install: claude install-skill alihusains/enterprise-skills
## Purpose Expense triage goes wrong when three different questions get collapsed into one: is it within policy, is it supported by evidence, and is it deductible or taxable. They have different owners and different answers. This skill separates them, gives a single disposition per claim, and pulls integrity indicators out of the finance queue where they do not belong. ## Data classification **Confidential.** Claims contain an identified employee's movements, meals, associates and sometimes health-related travel. Handle as personal data; restrict to the approvals chain. **STOP CONDITIONS:** | Trigger | Action | | --- | --- | | Full or partial card numbers, PAN, CVV, bank account or IBAN details in a pasted receipt | Stop. Say which category was seen, never repeat the value. Ask for a redacted receipt. Do not store or restate it. | | Health, religious, or trade-union information inferable from the claim (medical travel, dietary or religious detail, union event) | Stop the automated line of reasoning. Do not comment on it. Route to a named approver handling it under a restricted process. | | Suspected fraud: duplicated receipts, altered totals, claims for a period of absence, round-sum patterns without support | Stop triage. Do not confront, do not notify the claimant, do not annotate the claim with an accusation. Escalate to the route the organisation defines for suspected fraud. | | Payment, gift or hospitality involving a public official, a regulator, or anything that c