operations-meeting-decision-capturelisted

Converts a meeting transcript or set of notes into three separated lists — decisions made (with who decided and on what basis), actions with a named owner and a date, and open questions — applying one hard rule: an item with no named owner or no date is recorded as an unresolved discussion, never promoted into a decision or an action with an invented owner. Use after a meeting, a workshop, a steering committee or a stand-up when the notes need turning into something trackable, when 'what did we actually agree' is being asked, or when last meeting's actions need checking before the next one. Trigger on 'capture the decisions', 'turn these notes into actions', 'what did we agree', 'meeting minutes', 'action items from this call', 'who owns what after that meeting'. Not for writing the recurring project status report that these actions feed (use operations-project-status-report if present, otherwise the project owner) and not for recording an architectural or technical choice with its options and consequences (u
alihusains/enterprise-skills · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 73

Install: claude install-skill alihusains/enterprise-skills

# Meeting decision capture ## Purpose The failure is not that meetings go unrecorded — it is that summaries are generous. A discussion where three people nodded becomes "agreed: migrate in Q3". An action nobody accepted gets attributed to whoever spoke last. Six weeks later the owner has never heard of it and the decision is relitigated from scratch. This skill separates what was actually decided from what was merely discussed, and refuses to manufacture the owner or the date that would make an item look finished. ## The rule that does the work **A decision without a named decider is a discussion. An action without a named owner and a date is a discussion.** When either is missing, the item goes in the open-questions list with the specific gap stated — `no owner named`, `no date agreed`, `no decision reached` — and, where useful, the sentence that would close it. Do not infer the owner from who raised the topic, who is most senior, who owns the adjacent system, or who has done it before. Every one of those inferences is reasonable and every one of them produces an action that never happens. The value here is entirely in the refusal. A model asked to summarise a meeting will produce a confident action list unprompted; producing the list is not the skill, declining to invent the missing half of it is. ## Prerequisites - **Inputs:** the transcript, recording notes, or written notes. Speaker attribution materially improves the output — without it, decisions can be capt