dev-review

Solid

Generate a concise, scannable alignment report (tables + bullets) comparing a feature's PRD against the actual implementation. Spawns a fresh reporter subagent that explores the codebase and reports deviations, future-affecting constraints, and untested areas — then offers to apply the doc corrections it surfaces back to the PRD/checkpoint. Use when implementation is finished (or nearly), before final testing.

AI & Automation 2 stars 0 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 78/100

Stars 20%
16
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Review a Feature's PRD-vs-Implementation Alignment Compare a feature's PRD against what was actually built, then surface a **concise, scannable** report — tables and bullets, not a wall of prose: deviations from the plan, constraints that affect future decisions, and untested areas. The audience is the architect who designed the feature, knows the overall picture, and does NOT touch the code — they triage in under a minute. The report is produced by a fresh `feature-reporter` subagent so the assessment is grounded in the codebase, not in this session's assumptions. After presenting, this skill offers to apply the doc corrections the report surfaces back to the PRD and checkpoint. ### SCOPE: REPORT + DOC WRITE-BACKS ONLY This skill reads, explores, reports, and — only on explicit confirmation — applies the report's documentation corrections back to the PRD/checkpoint. It NEVER touches code. - Do NOT fix bugs, implement steps, or change code — even if the report surfaces gaps. - Do NOT commit, push, or otherwise advance the work. - Do NOT write a standalone `review.md` — the report is presented in-session and its corrections flow into the PRD/checkpoint, not into a parallel file. - **The only files you may `Edit`** are the feature's own `.dev/<feature>/` PRD and checkpoint markdown — and only in Step 6, only the specific corrections the report's "Your call" column names, and only per-item on explicit user confirmation. If the report surfaces *implementation* work (a rea...

Details

Author
andreaserradev-gbj
Repository
andreaserradev-gbj/dev-workflow
Created
6 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

review

Dispatches parallel dimension agents across a diff, PR (URL or number), commit SHA, branch, staged changes, or patch file — covering security, correctness, api-compat, test-coverage, and perf-observability — synthesizes findings by severity, and emits a merge recommendation. Use when changes are ready for review before merge. Read-only: this skill analyzes and reports only — it never edits files, commits, pushes, comments on a PR, or modifies the PR description.

45 Updated today
griffinwork40
Code & Development Listed

pr-review

Project-aware PR review grounded in AGENTS.md conventions and vault memory. Runs a multi-dimension review: correctness, convention compliance, test quality, security, performance, and conditional checks (TDQS scoring, feature surface docs). Use when asked to "review this PR", "review PR #X", "do a thorough review", "review against AGENTS.md", or "review with my preferences in mind". Complements the built-in /code-review (which is generic) by loading project-specific conventions and personal preferences. NOT for: quick CI failure diagnosis (use pr-monitor), post-merge testing (use verify), or code simplification without a PR context (use code-quality).

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
aliasunder
Code & Development Listed

review

Review, audit, sanity-check, look-at any review-able target. Triggers on a GitHub PR URL (fetched via the gh CLI), a local path or "." (review the working tree), a markdown/doc file, or a comment-thread URL. Read-only by default; --fix applies accepted findings locally and pushes to the PR branch after confirmation (never force, never merge, never to a protected branch). Produces severity-tiered findings (blocker / critical / should / may / nit) with path:line and <=15-word verbatim evidence quotes. Six dimensions: correctness, tests, security, performance, readability, consistency. For a deep PR review with cross-file code-context retrieval, use /adk:pr-review.

0 Updated 5 days ago
sujeet-pro