← ClaudeAtlas

image-model-selectionlisted

Choose between APImage's image models — flux-2-klein-9b, flux-2-pro, flux-2-max, gpt-image-2 and dall-e-3 — and the resolution to pair with each. Use whenever the user is generating images with APImage, asks which model to use, mentions credit cost on images, or is getting output that isn't good enough.
apimageorg/apimage-skills · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 72
Install: claude install-skill apimageorg/apimage-skills
# Choosing an Image Model Five models across two endpoints, priced 1-9 credits depending on model and resolution. The decision is mostly about where you are in the loop and whether the output has text or a specific product in it. ## The models **Image Studio** (`/image-studio`) — generation and editing: | Model | Use for | |---|---| | `flux-2-klein-9b` | Cheapest. Volume drafts, composition exploration | | `flux-2-pro` | **Default.** The right answer for most work | | `flux-2-max` | Highest fidelity. Hero shots, print, anything going behind ad spend | | `gpt-image-2` | Also available here | **OpenAI Images** (`/ai-image-generate`): | Model | Use for | |---|---| | `gpt-image-2` | **Default here.** Strong prompt adherence, better at text | | `dall-e-3` | Legacy. Rarely the right choice now | ## The two decisions that actually matter **1. Is there text in the image?** FLUX models render text poorly — garbled, misspelled, inconsistent. `gpt-image-2` is materially better at it. So: packaging with legible copy, signage, a label you need readable, a mockup with real words — use `gpt-image-2`. Everything else, FLUX. Even then: **if the text has to be exactly right, overlay it in an editor.** No model is reliable enough for a product label you'll ship. See `packaging-mockup-generation`. **2. Where are you in the loop?** ``` Explore composition flux-2-klein-9b cheap, many Iterate the look flux-2-pro default Final hero flux-2-max once ```