reviewerlisted

<!-- @harness-posture: portable — prose review protocol over file reads + git; the ~/.claude command mention (SKILL.md:75) is an operator invocation convenience, not a runtime dependency --> > **Authoritative for:** /reviewer skill — the interactive review-session choreography: modes, economy defaults, verdict output shape. > **NOT authoritative for:** reviewer ROLE discipline (role separation, never-decide-strategy) and the severity contract + ESCALATED grammar — [.claude/rules/reviewer-discipline.md](../../rules/reviewer-discipline.md) (§6 is the operating SSOT), which this skill layers over, never re-describes. Cold PR-boundary audits — [agents/fidelity-auditor.md](../../../agents/fidelity-auditor.md), [agents/review-sidecar.md](../../../agents/review-sidecar.md). Seat lifecycle — NOT applicable: the interactive reviewer is not a registry role (exactly three roles, [seat-lifecycle.md §1](../../rules/seat-lifecycle.md)); review seats are checkpoints, never execution owners ([advisor-pattern design §5](../../../docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-10-advisor-pattern-design.md)). Project goal — [README.md#why-this-exists](../../../README.md#why-this-exists). # /reviewer — interactive review session > **Origin:** 2026-08-10. The interactive reviewer protocol lived only in the operator's > personal `~/.claude/commands/reviewer.md`, invisible to repo machinery: when > reviewer-discipline.md gained §6 (severity contract), the command kept the stale > triple grammar until hand-patche