self-reflectionlisted

Use when introducing or extending a rule, principle, pattern, methodology, discipline, or process change in this repository — before closing the recommendation, run §1.7 forward+backward checks. Auto-trigger on keywords «правило», «принцип», «дисциплина», «методология», «процесс», «recommend», «introduce rule», «new principle», «discipline change», «process rule», «meta», «recursive», «applies to itself», «check own work», «self-review», «forward check», «backward check», «closing recommendation», «discipline-bearing artefact», «self-reflection», «anti-pattern», or any edit touching `.claude/rules/`, `packages/core/principles/`, `docs/meta-factory/EXECUTION-PLAN.md`, `docs/meta-factory/prior-art-evaluations.md`, `CLAUDE.md`. **Do NOT trigger** on simple typo fixes, code edits without rule changes, or routine PR work — overuse fatigues the discipline.
artyhoo/getff · ★ 0 · Code & Development · score 58

Install: claude install-skill artyhoo/getff

# Self-reflection — recommendation discipline gate > **Authoritative for:** skill activation conditions (frontmatter `description`); §1.7 forward+backward checklist summary; output contract for discipline-introducing recommendations; pointers to cold references. > **NOT authoritative for:** the §1.7 rule itself — see [`.claude/rules/phase-research-coverage.md §1.7`](../../rules/phase-research-coverage.md). Project goal — see [README.md#why-this-exists](../../../README.md#why-this-exists). ## Why this skill exists Three documented occurrences of the same shape in 2026: 1. **PR #16** — `EXECUTION-PLAN §1` silently re-defined the project goal in the doc that was supposed to *prevent* drift. 2. **Prior session (4 turns)** — research about applying discipline-from-start, with the assistant repeatedly applying «defer until consumer pain» framing — the *opposite* of project's thesis, in a session whose subject was project's thesis. 3. **2026-05-09 L3 generated-docs research** — recommendation about doc-authority discipline failed forward+backward checks across 6 existing project disciplines; gap surfaced via reviewer pushback, not via own self-audit pass. Same root cause: **meta-cognitive blindspot** — the agent of analysis is not also the object of analysis. When the assistant reasons about discipline X, attention loads subject domain + prior art + trade-offs but **does not** load «the act of forming this recommendation must itself pass X». This skill operationalises the fix: