advisory-panellisted

# Advisory Panel: Comprehensive Decision Analysis You will analyze the following concept through four independent advisory perspectives using subagents for true isolation, then synthesize their insights into a unified recommendation. ## Input **Decision/Idea to Analyze:** $ARGUMENTS ## Workflow Checklist 1. [ ] **Build context briefing** from conversation (decision, background, constraints, stakeholders, prior analysis) — thorough enough that an advisor with no conversation history can produce a well-informed analysis 2. [ ] **Launch all 4 advisor subagents in parallel** in a single message — each invokes its skill via `Skill("advisor-visionary", args: "<context briefing>")` etc. — each runs in isolated context, producing structured output per its Output Format (200-400 words) 3. [ ] **Collect all 4 analyses** before proceeding 4. [ ] **Identify areas of agreement** 5. [ ] **Identify areas of disagreement** 6. [ ] **Extract critical callouts** 7. [ ] **Generate risk-adjusted recommendation** ## Synthesis Detail After all four subagents return their results, synthesize the findings: #### Areas of Agreement List insights where **3 or more advisors converge** on the same conclusion, recommendation, or concern. For each area: - State the common finding - Note which advisors agree (by name) - Include the strength of consensus (e.g., "All four advisors" vs "Three advisors") #### Areas of Disagreement List direct conflicts or tensions between advisors. For each disagreement