← ClaudeAtlas

review-designlisted

Use when reviewing frontend implementation against design specs - design system compliance, responsive behavior, accessibility audit
badrusiddique/enggenie-skill · ★ 0 · Code & Development · score 72
Install: claude install-skill badrusiddique/enggenie-skill
# Frontend Design Quality Review **Announce:** "I'm using enggenie:review-design to review the frontend implementation." ## Overview Review frontend code for design quality - not just "does it work" but "does it look and feel professional." Catches the gap between functional code and production-quality UI. ## Jira Ticket Entry When the user references a Jira ticket for design review (e.g., "Check design for PROJ-1234", "Review UI on PROJ-1234"): 1. Read the Jira ticket using MCP tools 2. Find the spec link - extract Figma references, design tokens, layout requirements, and responsive breakpoints documented by PM 3. Find the "Dev Handoff" comment - extract the PR link and what was built 4. Use the spec's design requirements as the review baseline - compare implementation against what was specified, not against generic best practices alone If Jira MCP is not available, ask: "I can't read PROJ-1234 directly. Can you share the design specs or Figma link?" --- ## What to Check ### 1. Design System Compliance - Are design system components used where they exist? (Not custom CSS for things the system handles) - Are spacing values from the design system tokens? (Not arbitrary px values) - Are colors from the design system palette? (Not hardcoded hex) - Are typography styles from the design system? (Not custom font-size/weight) ### Design Comparison Method Since AI agents cannot directly view Figma files: 1. Check if the spec (from pm-refine) includes Figma dimensions, to