ui-reviewerlisted

# UI Reviewer Review rendered interfaces, not intentions. The goal is a usable, product-specific design that does not read like an AI starter template. ## Review Process 1. **Capture the UI** - Screenshot or navigate to the app 2. **Capture 320, 768, 1024, and 1440px when possible** 3. **Analyze against the weighted rubric** 4. **Run swap, squint, signature, and token tests** 5. **Identify blocking issues and highest-leverage fixes** 6. **Re-review after changes when strict/99 mode is requested** ## 100-point rubric ### Product specificity and signature — 20 - Interface clearly reflects its user, domain, job, and content - A specific visual/structural/interaction signature is identifiable - Swapping in another product's name would not leave the design intact ### Anti-generic discipline — 20 - No unjustified AI-purple gradients, centered generic hero, bento/card spam, decorative pills, glowing blobs, generic feature grids, or default icon spam - Layout and components follow information priority rather than a template - Realistic content exposes wrapping, density, empty, and overflow behavior ### Hierarchy and composition — 15 - Focal point and reading order are immediate - Primary and secondary actions have correct visual weight - Spacing, density, grouping, and responsive reflow remain intentional ### Typography and color system — 15 - Typeface, scale, weight, rhythm, and measure express the intended tone - Semantic tokens and accent usage are consistent - Contr