full-reviewlisted

# Full Review A disciplined, multi-pass review for high-stakes human-facing copy — resumes, cover letters, portfolio pages, case studies, proposals, bios. This is the orchestrator of the `red-pen` pack: it runs the full process and **delegates** the two focused checks (`ai-written-check`, `cringe-check`) rather than restating them, then adds the passes only it owns. Use it at **any** stage of refining copy with AI, not only the final pass — any time you've drafted, expanded, or edited something with Claude and want to make sure the result still says what you meant and claims only what's true. The first draft of any change is the **starting position for a conversation, not the final proposal.** Expect 2–4 iterations per piece. ## The six passes (run in order) Run every pass explicitly and report under each heading, even if a pass is clean ("Pass 2: no issues"). 1. **AI tells** — *delegate to the `ai-written-check` skill.* Apply it directly; do not restate its catalog here. (If it isn't installed, see the 10-second fallback in `references/PASSES.md`.) 2. **Operator vs. academic** — does the copy position the author as someone who *ships* or someone who *observes*? Every "research about X" framing should pair with a "so that <decision shipped>" clause. Studying is not the credential; the decision it unblocked is. 3. **Honesty / overclaim** — does any claim assert authority or scope the author doesn't have? **Never silently upgrade the scope of a claim.** This is the