← ClaudeAtlas

change-reviewlisted

Review a branch, pull request, commit range, or working-tree diff on two axes: repository standards and the originating requirements. Use for explicit code or PR review, independent pre-merge quality gates, and checking an implementation against its specification. Do not use when there is no change set to inspect or the task is only to implement a known fix.
dayfinggg/claude-code-codex-skills · ★ 1 · Code & Development · score 74
Install: claude install-skill dayfinggg/claude-code-codex-skills
# Change Review This skill is the two-axis review (standards and specification). For a fast bug-focused pass over the working diff, the bundled `/code-review` command is the lighter option; use this skill when the change must also be checked against its stated requirements. Review the exact change against two independent questions: whether it is built correctly and whether it builds the requested thing. Read `references/evidence.md` when calibrating scope, finding usefulness, or severity. If delegation is explicitly authorized, apply `delegate-work` and assign only distinct review axes such as correctness, security, external compatibility, or rendered interface quality; keep synthesis and deduplication in the main session. ## Respect the Review Contract - Treat a review-only request as read-only. Do not modify code, resolve findings, or change repository state. - When the user explicitly requests review and fixes, complete the evidence-based review first, then correct supported findings and verify the result. - Review only the requested diff and directly affected behavior. Do not turn the review into a general codebase audit. - Preserve the distinction between repository standards and product requirements. ## Pin the Review Scope Resolve and verify the fixed point before reviewing: - the merge base, branch, commit, tag, or working-tree state; - committed, staged, unstaged, and untracked changes in scope; - generated, vendored, lock, schema, and migration files affecte