plan-reviewlisted

# Plan Review > **Load this skill** when reviewing implementation plans (not code). ## TL;DR Systematic plan review focused on 3 quality categories: Citation Quality, Completeness, and Actionability. Structure is pre-validated by `plan_save`—focus on whether the plan provides actionable implementation guidance. ## When to Use This Skill - When reviewing implementation plans before execution - When auditing plan quality after creation - When verifying plans meet documentation standards - As part of the plan validation workflow --- ## Plan Review Checklist ### 1. Structure (Pre-validated) > **Note:** Saved plans are structurally validated by `plan_save` before storage. > Format compliance (YAML frontmatter, status markers, CURRENT marker, numbering) is guaranteed. > Focus your review on the quality aspects below. ### 2. Citation Quality | Requirement | Check | |-------------|-------| | Decisions reference sources | `ref:delegation-id` format used | | No unsubstantiated claims | Architectural decisions cite research | | Research phases show refs | Completed research tasks include citations | | Citations are verifiable | IDs match actual delegation outputs | **Red Flags:** - Decisions table with empty or `-` in Source column - Claims like "industry standard" or "best practice" without citation - Research tasks marked complete without `→ ref:id` ### 3. Completeness | Requirement | Check | |-------------|-------| | Goal is specific | Measurable outcome, not vague intent