← ClaudeAtlas

slop-checklisted

Fresh-eyes logic-and-slop review of prose and copy. Catches writing that reads like fine English but is logically, mathematically, or definitionally wrong, plus internal contradictions, off-brand drift, and AI tells. NOT a fact-checker - run it as a logic gate AFTER the facts are verified, before publishing. Triggers: 'slop check', 'slop detector', 'logic and slop review', 'check this for AI slop', 'fresh-eyes review', 'is this writing logically sound', 'review my copy before publishing', 'catch contradictions and AI tells', 'gate A'. Works on one file or many (fans out one reviewer per file). Report-only - it never edits.
dzivkovi/claude-skills · ★ 0 · Data & Documents · score 65
Install: claude install-skill dzivkovi/claude-skills
# slop-check - fresh-eyes logic-and-slop review A reviewer that catches the class of error a fact-check and a spell-check both miss: writing that is grammatical and even factually true, yet logically, mathematically, or definitionally wrong - plus internal contradictions, drift off the piece's own stated point, and AI tells. It reports; it never edits. ## When to use it Run it as a **logic gate AFTER any factual fact-check** (it assumes the facts were verified elsewhere), on a drafted or already-published piece, before you ship. It is content-agnostic: articles, client briefs, emails, landing copy, READMEs. ## How to invoke ```bash /slop-check path/to/article.md # one file /slop-check draft-a.md draft-b.md # several (fans out, one reviewer each) ``` Or just ask in plain language ("run a slop check on article.md") - the `description` auto-triggers it. The SKILL is the trigger; there is no separate command file to maintain. Install it at `.claude/skills/slop-check/SKILL.md` in a project, or `~/.claude/skills/` to use it everywhere; on claude.ai, upload the `.zip` from `releases/`. ## How to run it Given one or more file paths: - **One reviewer per file.** For several files, dispatch them in parallel (a subagent each if your runtime supports subagents; otherwise review them one at a time with fresh attention per file). - Each reviewer returns its issue list and a one-line verdict. - Collect the findings, present them **grouped by file, highest severit