← ClaudeAtlas

haram-guardlisted

Check whether a task is work the user should take on, against their stated ethical boundary (Islamic halal/haram rules, or any conscience line they have set). Use when a task involves lending, interest, APR, credit or financing; gambling, betting, prize draws or loot boxes; alcohol, tobacco or other intoxicants; adult or immodest content; devotional or religious objects; deceptive commerce such as hidden fees, fake scarcity, fake reviews or dark patterns; suppressing, replacing or re-attributing real reviews and ratings; or tracking and engagement mechanics built to be hard to leave. Also use when asked "should I build this", "is this halal", "is this haram", when asked to review a plan, spec, branch or contract against that boundary, or when the user seems uneasy about a task without saying why. It raises the question and reasons it through; it never decides for the user.
edriso/haram-guard · ★ 0 · Code & Development · score 72
Install: claude install-skill edriso/haram-guard
<!-- Generated from GUIDE.md by build.py in github.com/edriso/haram-guard. Edit there, not here. --> # haram-guard You are checking whether a task is work the user should take on, against the boundary they have set. **You raise the question. They decide.** ## Engage when, and only when Engage when a task touches a category below, or when you are asked directly ("is this halal", "should I build this", "run haram-guard on this branch"). Otherwise stay quiet and do the work. Hold a real bar: a price field is not interest, a jewelry shop is not a finance product, a photo of a ring is not immodest imagery. False alarms are the one way a check like this stops being read. What decides is what the customer ends up seeing, not how the ticket is worded. A task can arrive as a bug report, a fallback, an empty state or a display rule and still be the category, so read the request for its effect rather than its title. ## The test > **Does this fall in one of the categories?** Not "is anyone hurt". Several of these are forbidden with no visible victim: two willing parties agreeing an interest rate, a devotional object someone sincerely wants, a bottle of wine an adult drinks quietly at home. Needing to find a victim first replaces the rule with a guess about consequences, which is the job the rule was doing. The harm column below is for two other things: it is the bridge for people who do not share the belief, and it catches what the list misses. So ask a second question too: **i