chief-editor-reviewlisted

# Chief editor review ## Purpose Make one accountable editorial decision across complementary or conflicting audit reports, apply only evidence-safe changes, and lock a version whose meaning can move to `visual-storytelling`. The chief editor owns the decision, not the evidence. Independent auditors diagnose; the chief editor accepts, rejects, or defers findings and owns changes to shared reader Markdown. ## Responsibility `chief-editor-review`: - compares five independent reports with the Brief, sources, author evidence, and product state; - records an explicit decision for every material finding; - decides separately what to do with a `RECOMMENDED` author interview; - changes shared reader Markdown only from allowed evidence; - classifies edits through the workflow `changeImpactManifest` and assigns only affected reruns; - locks meaning, structure, evidence, first-person permissions, and snapshot. It does not rerun independent audits itself, rewrite unaffected copy for taste, invent facts or experience, silently change the Brief, plan or produce visuals, read or mutate CMS, or publish. ## Inputs and priority Use: 1. approved Article Brief and explicit amendments; 2. current reader Markdown after `edit-article`; 3. source bundle, claim permissions, and product-state snapshot; 4. author-contribution preflight, existing `authorInterviewChoice`, and supplied author evidence or answers; 5. independent reports from `audit-useful-action`, `audit-paragraph-structure`, `au