github-pr-review

# GitHub PR review Resolves Pull Request review comments with severity-based prioritization, fix application, and thread replies. ## Current PR !`gh pr view --json number,title,state,milestone -q '"PR #\(.number): \(.title) (\(.state)) | Milestone: \(.milestone.title // "none")"' 2>/dev/null` ## Core workflow ### 1. Fetch, filter, and classify comments ```bash REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q '.nameWithOwner') PR=$(gh pr view --json number -q '.number') LAST_PUSH=$(git log -1 --format=%cI HEAD) # Inline review comments - filter out replies (keep only originals) gh api repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments?per_page=100 --jq ' [.[] | select(.in_reply_to_id == null) | {id, path, user: .user.login, created_at, body: .body[0:200]}] ' # PR-level reviews with non-empty body (CodeRabbit sections, Gemini, etc.) gh api repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews?per_page=100 --jq ' [.[] | select(.body | length > 0) | {id, user: .user.login, state, submitted_at, body: .body[0:500]}] ' ``` **Cross-check review-attached comments**: CodeRabbit's review body states "Actionable comments posted: N". If the general `pulls/$PR/comments` endpoint returns fewer than N new originals from that reviewer, some comments are only available via the review-specific endpoint. Fetch them and merge by comment ID: ```bash # $REVIEW_ID from the reviews fetch above; $EXPECTED from parsing "Actionable comments posted: N" gh api repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR/reviews/$REVIEW_ID/comments?per_page=100 --jq ' [....