← ClaudeAtlas

agentic-phase-workflowlisted

Run the issue-backed development loop that turns a ratified spec into shipped increments: select an owning Issue, confirm implementation authority, implement on a focused branch, open a draft PR after the first coherent green commit, review independently, repair with regression tests, reconcile documentation and tracking, and close delivery state after merge. Use when planning or running a feature phase, hardening pass, bundled phase, spec-drift audit, workflow-improvement release, or release closeout; when deciding whether work is phase-shaped or pass-shaped; or when sequencing Issues within a milestone. Do not use for day-one project bootstrap, repository-wide documentation migration, or ordinary Issue/PR administration that does not require choosing or running a development shape. Premise: the workflow is the product, as much as the code.
gidde032/agentic-workflow · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 66
Install: claude install-skill gidde032/agentic-workflow
# Agentic Phase Workflow The shape of AI-directed development work. This skill sequences the loop that turns a ratified contract and owning Issue into a reviewed, verified delivery without losing project coherence. The loop below is the **end state of ten documented revisions** — a new project starts here rather than re-deriving it. How each revision emerged from evidence belongs to `agentic-workflow-evolution`; this skill hands you the result. Worked examples and provenance: `examples.md`. --- ## 1. Start with a spec and a phased plan (before any code) If the problem, workflow, scope, experience, or visual direction is still materially unsettled, run `agentic-product-discovery` first. The spec should record ratified product choices, not conceal unresolved discovery inside an implementation plan. Write a spec first. It costs little and becomes the canonical scope reference for the whole project — reviewers cite it, defer/fix decisions turn on it, and "in scope vs. later" stops being an argument. On the reference project it took about 30 minutes to write, and reviewers then cited its sections directly when justifying findings (`examples.md` §2). A spec has four load-bearing parts. Generic skeleton: ``` # <Project> — Spec & Phase Outline ## 1. Overview — vision, target users, success criteria (one paragraph each) ## 2. Stack — table: layer | choice | rationale ## 3. Functional Reqs — FR-1, FR-2, ... each a testable "the tool must ..." ## 4. Non