the-quorumlisted

# The Quorum A decision gets sharper when it survives disagreement. The Quorum convenes five differentiated experts who each form a verdict **independently**, then challenge each other anonymously, before a chairman calls it. The point is not consensus — it's surfaced, structured disagreement that you can actually act on. The single most important design rule: **the five members must reason independently before they see each other's work.** If they anchor on one another, you get five flavors of the same answer and the whole exercise is theater. Protect the independence above all else. --- ## Trigger Fires on `quorum this <decision>` or `council this <decision>`, and proactively whenever the user is clearly weighing a consequential choice (see description). If the decision is trivial or easily reversible and the user just wants a quick take, say so and offer the full council rather than spinning up five agents for a coin-flip. --- ## Step 0 — Intake (don't skip this) Garbage in, five confident guesses out. Before convening anyone, establish four things. Infer what you can from context; ask **one** batched question only for what's genuinely missing: 1. **Options** actually on the table (including "do nothing"). 2. **Constraints** — budget, time, irreversible commitments, non-negotiables. 3. **Success** — what a good outcome looks like in concrete terms. 4. **Reversibility & stakes** — is this a *two-way door* (cheap to undo) or a *one-way door* (expensive or impossible