receive-review

Solid

Process code review feedback with technical rigor. Activates when the user shares review comments, PR feedback, or asks to address reviewer suggestions.

Code & Development 6 stars 0 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
28
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# zuvo:receive-review Protocol for responding to code review feedback. Every review comment gets the same structured treatment: understand it, verify it against the actual code, decide whether to fix or push back, then implement precisely. ## Mandatory File Reading Before starting work, read each file below. Print the checklist with status. ``` CORE FILES LOADED: 1. ../../shared/includes/run-logger.md -- READ/MISSING 2. ../../shared/includes/retrospective.md -- READ/MISSING 2. ../../shared/includes/knowledge-prime.md -- READ/MISSING 3. ../../shared/includes/knowledge-curate.md -- READ/MISSING ``` --- ### Knowledge Prime Run the knowledge prime protocol from `knowledge-prime.md`: ``` WORK_TYPE = "implementation" WORK_KEYWORDS = <keywords from user request> WORK_FILES = <files being touched> ``` --- ## The 6-Step Protocol Process each review item through all six steps before moving to the next item. ### Step 1: READ Read the complete feedback without reacting. Do not start fixing anything. - If the feedback is a PR comment thread, read every comment in the thread (not just the latest). - If the feedback is a list, read the entire list before acting on any item. - Identify each distinct action item. Number them for tracking. Output: ``` Review items identified: N 1. [file:line] <one-line summary> 2. [file:line] <one-line summary> ... ``` ### Step 2: UNDERSTAND For each item, restate what the reviewer is asking for in your own words. This is n...

Details

Author
greglas75
Repository
greglas75/zuvo
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category