review-brandlisted

# Review Brand & Copy (internal) Composed by `review-change` / `product-audit` within their conversation — on any agent, follow this file inline as the routed step. **Findings only; never edits, never refactors.** ## Scope The diff or path/glob the caller passes; default the current change vs the default branch. State the scope at the top of the returned table. ## Checklist (evaluate EVERY item — none is optional; n/a must be stated) - ✓ Read the project's brand doc first (e.g. `docs/brand/BRAND.md`) — cite the rule for every finding; n/a all items if the project has none and say so - ✓ Tone of changed copy matches the declared voice (cite the guideline violated) - ✓ Product/domain terms used consistently with the declared glossary (same concept, same word, same capitalization) - ✓ No forbidden/deprecated phrases from the brand doc - ✓ Claims are honest: limits, restrictions, and reductions the code enforces are disclosed in the copy (an undisclosed limitation is a major finding — repo hard rule) - ✓ Error/empty-state copy is actionable (says what happened and what to do), not blame-y - ✓ Consistency across the changed surface and its siblings (same action labeled the same way everywhere) - ✓ Placeholder/lorem text absent from the diff ## Return exactly ``` REVIEW BRAND — scope: <scope> | # | Finding | Sev | Evidence | Suggested fix | |---|---------|-----|----------|---------------| | 1 | <what> | critical|major|minor | <file:line> | <smallest action> |