← ClaudeAtlas

artifact-evallisted

The output gate for this repo. Runs on any deliverable before it is handed over, and also when the user says "review this deliverable", "is this ready", "check this before I send it", "quality check". Verifies the artifact is complete, honest about its assumptions, and free of the specific failures each artifact type is prone to. Returns a receipt. Gates deliverables this repo produced. To score your own AI system output against a rubric, with a separate judge and a logged cycle, use `eval-loop`.
guerrilla2799/ops-and-scale-os · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 74
Install: claude install-skill guerrilla2799/ops-and-scale-os
# Artifact Eval The last thing that runs. Checks the deliverable against the failures its type is prone to, and refuses to hand over work that is quietly incomplete. ## When to use - Before handing over any audit, model, spec, or plan produced by this repo - Before any number reaches a slide - When somebody asks whether a deliverable is ready ## Inputs - Reads: the artifact, plus its source skill's rules section - Needs from user: who the audience is, and whether any number in it is going to a board ## Workflow ### 1. Run the universal gates Any trip is a fail, regardless of how good the rest is. ``` GATE 1 An unsourced number. Every figure has a provenance or is marked [unverified] GATE 2 A borrowed benchmark presented as this company's own data GATE 3 A recommendation with no stated cost, owner, or date GATE 4 A customer-specific metric or logo with no clearance marker GATE 5 A conclusion the stated evidence does not support GATE 6 Prose that has not passed writing-quality ``` **Gate 2 is the one that slips most.** A benchmark table copied into a client deliverable becomes their number by the second reading, and nobody can find where it came from by the third. ### 2. Run the type-specific check | Artifact | The failure it is prone to | |---|---| | Systems audit | Eight problems and no single constraint. Interviews with no diagnostics run | | Object model | No named decision maker on the four definitions | | Scoring model | Thresholds set before the distribut